maybe because I'm not that young to cope with a steep learning curve of new softwares, but not that old to be able not to deal with this change of paradigm. It's just a feeling, I repeat, but I'm not confortable with it. I know we're in the early stages of some kind of research "revolution", and maybe even the greatest journals will modify their "citation styles" into something more "markdown-friendly". But again, it's hard to convince Obsidian to use some type of citation styles (I'm talking about Obsidian app, not any service/app that works ".md" into ".docx"), and if I use something like Zotero i end up having more than one app to do everything, while I would like "one app to rule 'em all". Leopards Lair Bush Lodge is situated in the Hoedspruit Wildlife Estate and offers guests an exciting bushveld experience. That's why I switched from Roam to Obsidian (but still keeping the first, as said), because of the "backlinking-thing" and the possibility to write notes and not bullets. THREAD: Group trips hardly succeed, here are affordable safari adventures for a solocation under R3000 on 2 nights stay. But, as I posted above, I feel like all those apps (call it "second brains", if you prefer) are very good at "taking" infos but not so good at "producing" them. Then the era of Roam (and Roam-like) outliners begun and I discovered a new way of organizing knowledge, being able to link and backlinking informations in an easy and efficient way. I've been using Scrivener since version 1.X and I really appreciated the possibility to "embed" files into the ".scriv" container, avoiding infinite wandering around my HDD when writing papers. html to run a ludicrously cheap blog via AWS but that requires technical skill. Here's an example of an Obsidian Vault published using Obsidian Publish that someone recently advertised on /r/obsidian: Īnd you can set up automated pipelines to convert. How you use that knowledge varies wildly between individuals.Īlso while not perfect and very opinionated Obsidian has Obsidian Publish. Which means working in a specialized tool. That last bit is key, because there's no PKM that I'm aware of that "automatically" generates outputs. The Zettelkasten is much more effort and time consuming than writing books. I don't think it's an accident that Luhmann wrote "Communicating with slip boxes" near the end of his career.īloggers often are incentivized to write articles from a shallow perspective on a variety of subjects to get readers to keep reading about the "new new thing" instead of diving into the guts and nuances of deep work in a single system. People who blog about note-taking systems don't produce them.
This is exacerbated by tool designers and bloggers who don't understand actual real world usage: Favoring inputs over outputs is a sign of the Collector's Fallacy:
0 kommentar(er)
